Analisis Kualitatif terhadap Fenomena "Peringatan Darurat Garuda Biru": Memahami Peran Framing dan Resonansi Emosional dalam Membentuk Opini Publik
Abstract
The emergence of the 'Garuda Biru' emergency alert symbol in Indonesia reflects the evolving dynamics of political communication in the digital age. Widely disseminated across social media platforms such as Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook, this symbol has become a rallying point for those who oppose perceived constitutional injustices and express dissatisfaction with the nation's political climate. This study aims to analyze the potential of the 'Garuda Biru' symbol in shaping political perceptions, particularly among younger generations. By employing framing analysis and content virality evaluation, this research assesses how social media influences political viewpoints and public discourse in the digital realm. Findings indicate that the 'Garuda Biru' symbol serves as a visual framing device, fostering collective solidarity through emotional resonance and viral content. Social media not only accelerates the spread of political issues but also effectively frames narratives, mobilizing the public both emotionally and cognitively. The symbol primarily functions to convey public discontent with government policies, strengthen cross-group solidarity, and ignite national identity. This study offers new insights into the role of social media as a catalyst for transformative changes in the political consciousness of contemporary society, emphasizing the significance of visual symbolism in digital political communication.
ABSTRAK
Munculnya simbol Peringatan Darurat Garuda Biru di Indonesia mencerminkan dinamika komunikasi politik yang terus berkembang di era digital. Fenomena ini meluas di berbagai platform media sosial, termasuk Twitter, Instagram, dan Facebook, sebagai simbol perlawanan terhadap ketidakadilan konstitusional dan ketidakpuasan terhadap kondisi politik nasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis potensi simbol Garuda Biru dalam membentuk persepsi politik, khususnya di kalangan generasi muda. Menggunakan metode analisis pembingkaian dan evaluasi viralitas konten, studi ini mengevaluasi bagaimana media sosial membentuk pandangan politik dan memengaruhi wacana publik di ruang digital.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa simbol Garuda Biru berfungsi sebagai alat framing visual yang memperkuat solidaritas kolektif melalui resonansi emosional dan viralitas konten. Media sosial tidak hanya mempercepat penyebaran isu politik tetapi juga membingkai narasi secara efektif, memobilisasi publik secara emosional dan kognitif. Simbol ini terutama berfungsi untuk menyampaikan ketidakpuasan publik terhadap kebijakan pemerintah, memperkuat solidaritas lintas kelompok, dan membangkitkan identitas nasional. Studi ini memberikan wawasan baru tentang peran media sosial sebagai katalis perubahan transformatif dalam kesadaran politik masyarakat kontemporer, dengan menekankan pentingnya penggunaan simbol visual dalam komunikasi politik digital.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aditya, N. R., & Ihsanuddin. (2024, August 21). DPR Setujui RUU Pilkada untuk Anulir Putusan MK, Hanya PDI-P yang Menolak. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/08/21/19244561/dpr-setujui-ruu-pilkada-untuk-anulir-putusan-mk-hanya-pdi-p-yang-menolak
Ayu, H., Sunyata, L., Si, M., Utami, D., & Ip, S. (2019). DISTORSI KOMUNIKASI VERTIKAL PADA DEPARTEMEN HOUSEKEEPING HOTEL ORCHARDZ GAJAHMADA PONTIANAK. http://jurmafis.untan.ac.id;http://jurnal.fisipuntan.org
Bakker, A. B. (2017). Strategic and proactive approaches to work engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.002
Bryman, Alan. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Burke, C. A. (2010). Mindfulness-based approaches with children and adolescents: A preliminary review of current research in an emergent field. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-009-9282-x
Castells, M. (2009). Mobile communication and society: a global perspective. Mit Press.
Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007). Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches / J.W. Creswell.
DeLuca, K. M., Lawson, S., & Sun, Y. (2012). Occupy Wall Street on the Public Screens of Social Media: The Many Framings of the Birth of a Protest Movement. Communication, Culture & Critique, 5(4), 483–509. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2012.01141.x
Doerr, N., Mattoni, A., & Teune, S. (2013). Toward a visual analysis of social movements, conflict, and political mobilization. In Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change (Vol. 35). https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X(2013)0000035004
Edelman, M. (1985). Political Language and Political Reality. PS, 18(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/418800
Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of A Fractured Paradigm. The Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Gamson, W. (1992). The Social Psychology of Collective Action (A. D. Morris). Yale University Press.
Isn, K. (2024, August 21). Poin-Poin Putusan MK soal Syarat dan Usia calon Kepala Daerah. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20240820162912-12-1135392/poin-poin-putusan-mk-soal-syarat-dan-usia-calon-kepala-daerah
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. University of Chicago Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=mvRM9mEDkn0C
Jo, B. (2024, August 21). Isi Putusan MK soal Pilkada 2024 Berlaku Untuk PDIP di Jakarta? Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/isi-putusan-mk-soal-pilkada-2024-berlaku-untuk-pdip-di-jakarta-g2V2
Konrath, S. H., O’Brien, E. H., & Hsing, C. (2011). Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310377395
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (Fourth Edition). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Krissandi, A. D. S., & Setiawan, K. A. C. (2018). Kritik Sosial Stand Up Comedy Indonesia Dalam Tinjauan Prakmatik. Pena : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 7(2), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.22437/pena.v7i2.5316
Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. In Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace.
Loader, B., & Mercea, D. (2011). NETWORKING DEMOCRACY? Information Communication and Society, 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.592648
Mantalean, V., & Ihsanuddin. (2024, August 21). DPR Manut MA dan Tolak MK soal Usia Cagub, Angin Segar untuk Kaesang. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/08/21/14482171/dpr-manut-ma-dan-tolak-mk-soal-usia-cagub-angin-segar-untuk-kaesang
Ningtyas, Ika. J. Nuurrianti. (2024). Indonesia’s “Emergency Warning” Movement Against Jokowi’s Political Dynasty _ FULCRUM. https://fulcrum.sg/indonesias-emergency-warning-movement-against-jokowis-political-dynasty/
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). We Have Always Been Social. Social Media + Society, 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115581185
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Group , The.
Porta, D. D., & Tarrow, S. G. (2005). Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Rowman & Littlefield. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=o3E7rF6WgKwC
rca. (2024, August 21). Kawal Putusan MK dan Tolak Pilkada Akal-akalan Trending Topic di X. 2024. https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/1439831/12/kawal-putusan-mk-dan-tolak-pilkada-akal-akalan-trending-topic-di-x-1724198888/10
Setiyaningsih, L. A. (2020). Lian Agustina Setiyaningsih 101 MEDIA PANICS IBU RUMAH TANGGA SETELAH MENGAKSES BERITA COVID-19.
Soroka, S. (2006). Good News and Bad News: Asymmetric Responses to Economic Information. Journal of Politics, 68, 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00413.x
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques.
SUNSTEIN, C. R. (2018). Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media (NED-New edition). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv8xnhtd
Tucker, J., Theocharis, Y., Roberts, M., & Barberá, P. (2017). From Liberation to Turmoil: Social Media And Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 28, 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0064
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. In Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300228175
Wahyudi, M. (2022). RELASI PEMERINTAH-GERAKAN SOSIAL: STUDI PADA GERAKAN LINGKUNGAN JELANTAH4CHANGE. In Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi Juli (Vol. 2022, Issue 3).
we/aha. (2023, November 1). Komisi II Sepakati Revisi PKPU Terkait Syarat Usia Capres-Cawapres. Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. https://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/47269/t/Komisi+II+Sepakati+Revisi+PKPU+Terkait+Syarat+Usia+Capres-Cawapres
Wedeen, L. (2008). Peripheral Visions: Publics, Power, and Performance in Yemen. Bibliovault OAI Repository, the University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226877921.001.0001
Zulfika, A., & Sutejo, Y. (2021). Fenomena Gerakan Sosial Digital Mahasiswa Untirta Dengan Hastag #UntirtaKokPelit Di Twitter. Ijd-Demos, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v3i3.99
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/jk.v13i2.6144
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Member of :
Visit us here >>>
Komunikatif : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi secretariat:
Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya, Kampus Dinoyo. Jl. Dinoyo No.42-44, Keputran, Kec. Tegalsari, Kota SBY, Jawa Timur 60265
KOMUNIKATIF : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License