THE IMPACT OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE WITH THE COMPOSITION OF TOP MANAGEMENT AS THE MODERATING VARIABLE

Dian Indri Purnamasari, Ratna Hindria

Abstract


The present research aims to study the impact of management information system on the performance of organization with the composition of top management as the moderating variable. The research objects are heads of university management, both state and private. The hypothesis testing was performed using Moderated Regression Analysis. The test results showed that the management information system positively affects the universities’ organizational performance. This means that the better the management information system, the higher the performance of a university. The composition of top management has no effect as the moderating variable between MIS and university performance. Thus, the composition of the top management does not reinforce the influence of management information system on the performance of organizations (universities).

Save to Mendeley


Full Text:

PDF

References


Carpenter, M.A., Geletkanycz,M.A., dan Sanders W.G. 2004. Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequeces of Top ManagementTteam Composition. Journal of Management. 30,749-778.

Choe, J. M. 1996. The relationships among performance of accounting information systems, influence factors and evolution level of information systems, Journal of Management Information Systems. 12 (4), p. 215-239.

Chomeya, R. 2010. Quality of Psychology Test Between Likert Scale 5 and 6 Points. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 399-403.

Cooper, D. dan Schindler, P. 2001. Business Research Methods,7th edition, McGraw Hill, Singapore

Fuller-Love, N dan Cooper,J. 1996. Competition or co-operation? Strategic Information Management in the National Health Service: A Case Study of the Ceredigion NHS Trust. International Journal of Information Management. 16(3), 219-232.

Gil, D. N 2009. Management Information System and Strategic Performances: The Role of Top Team Composition. International Journal of Information Management. 29, 104-110.

Gill, J. O. 2004. Dasar-Dasar Analisis Keuangan. Informasi Keuangan untuk Semua Manajer. Penerbit: PPM.b

Gujarati, D. N. 1995. Basic Econometrics, McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Gupta, A., dan Govindarajan,V. 1984. Business Unit Strategy, Managerial Characteristics, and Business Unit Effectiveness at Strategy Implementation. Academy of Information Management. 27, 397-405.

Hagan D., Watson,0., dan Barron,K. 2007. Ascending into ssorder:A Reflective Analisis from a Small Open Source Develompment Team. International Journal of Information Management.27,397-405.

Hair, J., Rolph A., Ronald T. dan William B. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis,5th edition, Prentice Hall International Inc, New Jersey.

Hambrick, D. C. dan P. A. Mason. 1984. The Oragnization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review. 9(2). 193-206.

Hartman, Frank dan Victor, S, Mass. 2010. Why Business Unit Controllers Create Budget Slack: Involvement in Management, Social Pressure, and Machiavellianism, Behavioral Research in Accounting. Vol. 22, No. 2, p. 27-49.

Jogiyanto, H. 2011. Pedoman Survei Kuesioner: Pengembangan Kuesioner, Mengatasi Bias dan Meningkatkan Respon. BPFE, Yogyakarta.

Kaul, T. N. 1997. Introduction to Science. Science Publishing, Inc. United States.

Lin, L. Y dan Chen, C. S. 2006. The Influence of The Country of Origin Image, Product Knowledge and Product Involvement on Consumer Purchase Decisions: An Empirical Study of Insuranced Catering in Taiwan. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 23(5), 248-265.

Simon, Herbert, A. 1999. Administrative Behavior (Perilaku Administrasi). Alih Bahasa. Jakarta: PT. Bina Aksara.

O’Brien, J. A, dan George, M. M. 2006. Management Systems Information 7th edition. New Jersey: McGraw Hill.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/rima.v1i1.2575