• Home
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
  • Archive
  • Announcements
  • Editorial Board
MAIN MENU
  • Home
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
  • Current
  • Browse
  • Announcements
  • Submit
  • Editorial Board

MAGISTER SCIENTIAE

ABOUT THE JOURNAL
Authors Guidelines
Focus and Scope
Editorial Board
Reviewer
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Peer Review Process
Announcements
Contact Us

Visitors (since November 13th, 2017):

 

View Magister Scientiae Stats
Flag Counter

About The Authors

Agustinus Ngadiman

Connie Tanone

User
Journal Content

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
  • Other Journals
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Keywords Early Childhood teachers, readiness and involvement, online learning English vocabulary, Quizlet, students’ attitudes ICT, ICT literacy, TPACK, English teaching, generation Z Intelligence Quotient (IQ), Emotional Quotient (EQ), Spiritual Quotient (SQ), Speaking Proficiency, Indonesian Adults. Speaking, Textbook, Content Feasibility causal-comparative cloze technique distance learning, early childhood, early childhood education teacher eleventh graders higher-order thinking intermediate listening junior high school language learning strategies, high achievers, low achievers online learning reading ability reading comprehension questions reading proficiency self-efficacy students’ perspectives writing self-efficacy young learners, speaking, role-play
Home > No 36 (2014) > Ngadiman

Adversative Cojuncts in The Academic Article of Indonesian Scholars

Agustinus Ngadiman, Connie Tanone

Abstract


This study focuses on the English adversative conjunctions empl0yed by Indonesian scholars in their academic essays. The data sources for this study were twenty introduction part of the academic writing written by Indonesian EFL teachers published I TEFLIN journals in 2002 – 2011. The instrument of this study was the writer herself. The data were analyzed based on the categorization of adversative conjunction by Murcia and Freeman (1999). The study reveals that there were variety of adversative conjuncts used in the academic essays,: (1) proper, (2) contrastive, (3) correction, (4) dismissal but not all the adversative conjuncts were appropriately used which might not be realized by many writers. 85% of the writers misused the adversative conjuncts in their papers. The might be two possible causes of errors: (1) false-concept of hypothesis and (2) the interference of the L1.

Save to Mendeley


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/mgs.v0i36.626
PUBLISHER
Faculty of Teacher Education
Jl. Kalijudan 37, Surabaya 60114
Email: magister-scientiae@ukwms.ac.id

Magister Scientiae is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ISSN: 2622-7959

Hosted by Mason Publishing, part of the George Mason University Libraries.