Focus and Scope
Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer contains the original of research paper. It covers the results of research following topics: financial accounting, management accounting, accounting information systems, auditing, public sector accounting, corporate governance, taxation, and contemporary issues in business that affect accounting. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer is published three times a year (January, May, and September) since 2022.
Section Policies
Article
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Peer Review Process
The manuscripts are all submitted by the author through Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer online system. The peer-review process as follows: (1) the editor conducts an initial review of all manuscripts within 5 working days. The purpose of the initial review to make sure the manuscripts cover the focus and scope of Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer. And also to make sure there is no possibility of misconduct including authorship, ownership, and plagiarism. The author has 10 working days to fulfill the initial review’s results. (2) If the submitted manuscripts fulfill the first step, the submitted manuscript will be sent to two reviewers who do not have the potential conflict of interest. The peer-review process is double-blinded. The review process takes 15 working days for each reviewer. (3) The reviewers return the recommendation to the Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer editors. The recommendation provides the deliberation of the submitted manuscripts and also constructive comments which are minor or major revisions. (4) The editors will send the reviewers’ recommendation to the author. The author has a maximum of 5 working days for minor revision to improve his/her manuscripts. If the revision is major, the author may take longer (maximum 15 working days) to improve the manuscripts. (5) The revision manuscripts from the author are sent back to the previous reviewer. (6) The final decision is lie on the Editorial Board. This process may take 2 months until the online publications.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles in Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer (JAKO) published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Peer Review Process
The manuscripts are all submitted by the author through Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer online system. The peer-review process as follows: (1) The editor conducts an initial review of all manuscripts. The purpose of the initial review to make sure the manuscripts cover the focus and scope of Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer. And also to make sure there is no possibility of misconduct including authorship, ownership, and plagiarism. (2) If the submitted manuscripts fulfill the first step, the submitted manuscript will be sent to two reviewers who do not have the potential conflict of interest. The peer-review process is double-blinded. The review process takes 2-4 weeks for each reviewer. (3) The reviewers return the recommendation to the Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer editors. The recommendation provides the deliberation of the submitted manuscripts and also constructive comments which are minor or major revisions. (4) The editors will send the reviewers’ recommendation to the author. The author has a maximum of one week for minor revision to improve his/her manuscripts. If the revision is major, the author may take longer to improve the manuscripts. (5) The revision manuscripts from the author are sent back to the previous reviewer. (6) The final decision is lie on the Editorial Board.
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed is a significant contribution to accounting and business research especially for emerging market issues and the process of improving science in accounting and business. The articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for the author, the editor, the peer reviewer, and the publisher. Widya Mandala Catholic University of Surabaya as a publisher takes the duty of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer is committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Duties of authors (These guidelines are based on Elsevier policies)
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial opinion works should be clearly identified as such.
Data access and retention
Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should, in any event, be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from ëpassing offí anotherís paper as the authorís own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of anotherís paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. All of the submitted works will be checked by anti-plagiarism software.
Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper. Publication of some kinds of articles (e.g. clinical guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.
Acknowledgement of sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.
Authorship of the paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Hazards and human or animal subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
All authors should disclose in the manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the authors’ obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.
Duties of the Editorial Board (These guidelines are based on based on Elsevier policies and COPEís Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)
Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other members of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are revealed after publication. If needed, other appropriate action should be taken, such as the publication of a retraction or expression of concern.
Involvement and cooperation in investigations
An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher (or society). Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made, but may also include further communications to the relevant institutions and research bodies, and if the complaint is upheld, the publication of a correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other note, as may be relevant. Every reported act of unethical publishing behavior must be looked into, even if it is discovered years after publication.
Duties of reviewers (These guidelines are based on based on Elsevier policies and COPEís Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)
Contribution to editorial decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication and lies at the heart of the scientific method.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and conflict of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in reviewers' own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Article Processing Charge
Fee for submitting, processing, and publishing the Article in Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer is IDR 500,000.00. (Effective as of January 16, 2023).
Plagiarism Check
All articles submitted to the journal are subject to plagiarism check. Articles that do not meet the requirement will be returned to authors for further editorial works or will be rejected immediately. Plagiarism checker used by the journal is Turnitin.