EFEKTIVITAS PETA STRATEGI DALAM ALOKASI BIAYA: SUATU EKSPERIMEN BERBASIS INTERNET

Jesica Handoko, I Made Narsa, Basuki Basuki

Abstract


Research Purposes. This study aims to test whether there are differences in resource cost allocations when decision makers receive negative or positive information.

Research Methods. This research with a 2x3x2 mixed subject design was conducted using an internet-based experimental application with the final result of 132 participants who passed the manipulation check.

Research Results and Findings. The study results do not show differences in resource cost allocations when there are differences in performance achievement. The effectiveness of the strategy map is proven to be significant when the decision makers get the strategy map visualization, that is, there is no excessive allocation compared to those in the group without the strategy map visualization.


Save to Mendeley


Keywords


Balanced Scorecard; Capaian Kinerja; Outcome Bias; Peta Strategi; Alokasi Biaya

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aranda, C. dan Arelano, J. (2010). Consensus and Link Structure in Strategic Performance Measurement Systems: A Field Study, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 22(1), 271-299.

Atkinson, A. A., Kaplan, R. S., Matsumura, E. M. dan Young, S. M. (2012). Management Accounting: Information for Decision Making and Strategy Execution. (edisi ke-6). New Jersey-USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Banker, R. D., Chang, H. dan Pizzini, M. J. (2004). The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Performance Measures Linked to Strategy. The Accounting Review, 79(1), 1-23.

Bartlett, G., Johnson, E. dan Reckers, P. (2014). Accountability and Role Effects in Balanced Scorecard Performance Evaluations When Strategy Timeline is Specified. European Accounting Review, 23(1), 143-165.

Birnberg, J. G., Luft, J. dan Shields, M. D. (2006). Psychology Theory in Management Accounting Research. Dalam Chapman, C.S., Hopwood, A.G., dan Shields, M.D. (Ed). Handbook of Management Accounting Research (Volume 1, h. 113-135). Oxford: Elsevier

Bolt-Lee, C. E. dan Swain, M. (2016). Highlights of Management Accounting Research, Journal of Accountancy, 222(6), 50-54.

Brandon, D. M., Long, J. H., Loraas, T. M., Mueller-Phillips, J. dan Vansant, B. (2014). Online Instrument Delivery and Participant Recruiting Services: Emerging Opportunities for Behavioral Accounting Research. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 26(1), 1–23.

Capelo, C. dan Dias, J.F. (2009). A System Dynamics-based Simulation Experiment for Testing Mental Model and Performance Effects of Using the Balanced Scorecard. System Dynamics Review, 25(1), 1-34.

Cheng, M. M dan Humphreys, K.A. (2012). The Differential Improvement Effects of the Strategy Map and Scorecard Perspectives on Managers' Strategic Judgments. The Accounting Review, 47(3), 1-13.

Chenhall, R.H. dan Moers, F. (2015). The Role of Innovation in the Evolution of Management Accounting and Its Integration into Management Control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 70, 92-105.

Cooper, D. R. dan Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business Research Methods. (edisi ke-12). Singapore: Mc.Graw Hill.

Farrell, A. M., Kadous, K. dan Towry, K. L. (2012). Does the Communication of Causal Linkages Improve Employee Effort Allocations and Firm Performance? An Experimental Investigation. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 24(1), 77-102.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. (edisi ke-9). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Handoko, J. dan Wehartaty, T. (2017). Strategic Balanced Scorecard Implementation in Controlling Bias and Conflict. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 15(1), 57-65.

Hansen, E. G. dan Schaltegger, S. (2018). Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and Their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 937-952.

Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 Years of Studies on The Balanced Scorecard: Trends, Accomplishments, Gaps and Opportunities for Future Research. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 33-59.

Huck, S.W. (2012). Reading Statistics and Research. (Edisi ke-6). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Humphreys, K. A., dan Trotman, K.T. (2011). The Balanced Scorecard: The Effect of Strategy Information on Performance Evaluation Judgments. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 23, 81-98.

Humphreys, K. A., Gary, M. S., dan Trotman, K. T. (2016). Dynamic Decision Making Using the Balanced Scorecard Framework. The Accounting Review, 91(5), 1441-1465.

Johnson, E. N., Reckers, P. M. J. dan Bartlett, G. D. (2014). Influences of Timeline and Perceived Strategy Effectiveness on Balanced Scorecard Performance Evaluation Judgments. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(1), 165-184.

Kahneman, D. dan Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.

Kaplan, R.S. (2009). Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard. dalam Chapman, C. S., Hopwood, A. G., dan Shields, M. D. (Ed). Handbook of Management Accounting Research (Volume 3, h. 1253-1269). Oxford: Elsevier.

Kaplan, R.S. dan Norton, D.P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, January-February 1992, 71-79.

Kaplan, R. S. dan Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

Kaplan, R.S. dan Norton, D.P. (2006). Alignment: Using The Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

Kaplan, S. E., Petersen, M. J. dan Samuels, J. A. (2012). An Examination of the Effect of Positive and Negative Performance on the Relative Weighting of Strategically and Non-Strategically Linked Balanced Scorecard Measures. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 24(2), 133-151.

Kaplan, S. E., Petersen, M. J. dan Samuels, J. A. (2018). Further Evidence on The Negativity Bias in Performance Evaluation: When Does The Evaluator’s Perspective Matter?. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(1), 169-184.

Khalifeh, C.J.. dan Sivabalan, P. (2017). An Experimental Study on the Effect of Budget Information on Balanced Scorecard Preparer Individual Learning. Australian Accounting Review, 28(64, Issue 1), 39-52.

Lalwani, A.K. (2006). Negativity and Positivity in Product Evaluations: The Impact of Consumer Goals and Prior Attitudes. (Disertasi, Business Administration Program University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Amerika Serikat). Didapat dari https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/84550.

Maines, L. A., dan McDaniel, L. S. (2000). Effects of Comprehensive-Income Characteristics on Nonprofessional Investors' Judgments: The Role of Financial-Statement Presentation Format. The Accounting Review, 75(2), 179 – 207.

Nahartyo, E., dan Utami, I. (2019). Panduan Praktis Riset Eksperimen. Jakarta: Indeks.

Rigby, D. dan Bilodeau, B. (2018). Management Tools dan Trends: Five Keys Trends Emerged from Bain’s Survey of 1.268 Managers. Didapat dari https://www.bain.com/insights/management-tools-and-trends-2017/, 30 Agustus 2020, pukul 22.30 WIB.

Wibbeke, L. M. dan Lachmann, M. (2020). Psychology in Management Accounting and Control Research: An Overview of The Recent Literature. Journal of Management Control, 31(2), 275-328.

Wong-On-Wing, B., Guo, L., Li., W. dan Yang, D. (2007). Reducing Conflict in Balanced Scorecard Evaluations. Accounting, Organizations and Society,32, 363-377.

Yuniningsih. (2016). Keputusan Risk Taking Dalam Berinvestasi Berdasarkan Loss Aversion, Informasi, dan Evaluasi. (Disertasi Program Doktor Ilmu Ekonomi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia). Didapatkan dari https://repository.unair.ac.id/57295/.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/jako.v14i1.3199