THE EFFECT OF YOUTUBE ON SPEAKING ABILITY OF SENIOR HIGH STUDENTS
Abstract
YouTube is a rich source for teaching speaking in EFL contexts. You Tube also enables students to learn language of the world. The present study aimed to know whether secondary students in Indonesia who frequently watched You Tube in English speak better that than those who seldom. This was an ex-post-facto study. A questionnaire and speaking test were designed to students speaking ability. T-test and ANOVA were used to measure the different effects of You Tube. The present study revealed that the speaking ability of the subjects who watched You Tube exceeded the speaking ability of those who seldom watched You Tube. Based on the T-test analysis, YouTube gave good effect on students’ speaking ability, however based on the ANOVA analysis, You Tube gave the highest effect on the vocabulary aspect of their speaking ability.
Keywords: YouTube, Speaking Skills, EFL Students
Save to Mendeley
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abidin , Z., Muhammadi, M. P., Singh, K. K., Azman, R., & Souriyavongsa, T. (2011). The Effectiveness of Using Songs in YouTube to Improve Vocabulary Competence among Upper Secondary School Studies. Academy Publisher , 1, 1488-1496.
Almoswai, F. R., & Rashid, B. (2017). The effectiveness of Using YouTube Video on EFL Iraqi College Students’ Performance in Grammar at Missan University. International Journal of Social Science, 3 (1), 391-402.
Alsulami, S. (2016). The effects of technology on learning English as a foreign language among female EFL students at Effatt College: an exploratory study. Studies in Literature and Language, 12, 1-16.
Alwehaibi, H. O. (2015). The impact of using YouTube in EFL classroom on enhancing EFL students’ content learning. Journal of College Teaching and Learning (TLC), 12(2), 121-126.
Arends, R. (1998). Learning to Teach (Forth ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Baker , J., &Westrup, H. (2003). Essential Speaking Skill (first ed.). Lexington Avenue, New York: Continuum.
Brook, J. (2011). The Affordance of YouTube for Language Teaching and Learning. Hawaii Pacific University TESOL , 37-56.
Brown, H. (2007). Principles Language Learning and Teaching. The United State of America: Pearson.
Gray, K., &Tobing, J. (2010). Introducing an online community into a clinical education setting: a pilot study of student and staff enggagement and outcomes using blended learning. BMC Medical Education, 10,6.
Jalaluddin, M. (2016). Using YouTube to Enhance Speaking Skills in ESL Classroom. English for Specific Purposes World , 17 (No.50), 1-5.
Lee, L. (2010). Fostering reflective speaking and interactive exchange through blogging in an advanced language course. ReCALL, 22(2), 212-227. http://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401000008X.
Lou, S-J., Wu, S-C., Shih, R,-C & Tseng, K.-H. (2010). Adoption of blogging by a Chinese language composition class in a vocational high school in Taiwan. Austral-asian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 898-916. Hyyp://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1049
Leliani, S., Agustini, M., &Maryani, L. (2014, May 16-18). Integrating ICT to EFL Classroom. Proceedings , B25-258.
Mun, C. Y. (2014). Effects of Online Video Support on Listening Comprehension and EFL Learner's Perceptions. STEM Journal, 15, 147-166.
Ngadiman, A. (2019). Reading. Surabaya: Laros.
Shih, R.-C. (2010). Blended learning using video-based blogs: Public speaking for English as a secong language students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 883-897.
Wagner, E. (2007). Are they watching? Test- taker viewing behavior during an L2 video listening test. Language Learning and Technology, 11(1) 67- 86. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44089.
Watkins, J., & Wilkins, M. (2011). Using YouTube in the EFL Classroom. Language Education in Asia, 2, 113-119.
Weda, S. (2016, December). Demotivational Teaching Practices in EFL Classroom: Perceptions of English among. The Asian EFL Journal , 136-149.
Zorko, V. (2009). Factors affecting the way students collaborate in gaming for English language learning. Austral-asian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 645-665. http://doi.org/10.14742/ajet .113
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/mgs.v49i2.3401
