• Home
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
  • Archive
  • Announcements
  • Editorial Board
MAIN MENU
  • Home
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
  • Current
  • Browse
  • Announcements
  • Submit
  • Editorial Board

MAGISTER SCIENTIAE

ABOUT THE JOURNAL
Authors Guidelines
Focus and Scope
Editorial Board
Reviewer
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Peer Review Process
Announcements
Contact Us

Visitors (since November 13th, 2017):

 

View Magister Scientiae Stats
Flag Counter

About The Author

Bartholomeus Budiyono
Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya
Indonesia

User
Journal Content

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
  • Other Journals
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Keywords Early Childhood teachers, readiness and involvement, online learning English vocabulary, Quizlet, students’ attitudes ICT, ICT literacy, TPACK, English teaching, generation Z Intelligence Quotient (IQ), Emotional Quotient (EQ), Spiritual Quotient (SQ), Speaking Proficiency, Indonesian Adults. Speaking, Textbook, Content Feasibility causal-comparative cloze technique distance learning, early childhood, early childhood education teacher eleventh graders higher-order thinking intermediate listening junior high school language learning strategies, high achievers, low achievers online learning reading ability reading comprehension questions reading proficiency self-efficacy students’ perspectives writing self-efficacy young learners, speaking, role-play
Home > Vol 49, No 2 (2021) > Budiyono

ASSESSMENT LITERACY IN PPG BATCH 2020

Bartholomeus Budiyono

Abstract


One of the four competencies for professional teachers is the pedagogical competency that includes the ability to assess learning outcomes. This requirement should apply to teachers enrolled in teacher certification program (PPG). PPG Batch 20, however, did not provide teachers with any module for assessment literacy. This study administered a test to explore these teachers’ assessment literacy. The finding indicates that they belonged to the unacceptable-to-inadequate levels. An updated assessment literacy module is recommended to meet the purpose of assessment-literate teachers.

 


Save to Mendeley


Keywords


assessment literacy, PPG Batch 20

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arrafi, M. A., & Sumarni, B. (2018). Teachers’ understanding of formative assessment.

Lingua Cultura, 12(1), 45-52.

https://media.neliti.com/media/publicationS/229490-teachers-understanding-of-formative-asse- 0ede5F13.pdf.

Azis, A. (2015). Conceptions and Practices of Assessment: A Case of Teachers Representing

Improvement Conception. TEFLIN Journal Vol 26, No 2 (2015). http://www.teflin.org/journal/index.php/journal/article/vIEW/263.

Baker, B. and Riches, C. (2017). The development of EFL examinations in Haiti: Collaboration

and language assessment literacy development.

Language Testing 35(1):026553221771673

https://www.researchgate.net/publicatiON/322161378_The_development_of_EFL_examinations_in_Haiti_Collaboration_and_language_assessment_literacy_development.

Barbara S. Plake, B. S et al. (1993). Assessment Competencies of Teachers:

A National Survey.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/J.1745-3992.1993.tb00548.x.

Bastian, K. C et al. (2016). Teacher candidate performance assessments: Local scoring and

implications for teacher preparation program improvement. Teaching and Teacher Education 59(2016) 1-12

https://publicpolicy.unc.edu/wpcontent/uploads/sitES/107/2017/02/TATE_TPA_TeacherCandidate PerformAssesments.pdf.

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Educational Testing Service

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. Vol. 18, No. 1, February 2011, 5–25. https://www.researchgate.net/publicatiON/228836856_Formative_assessment_A_critical_review.

Berry, V et al. (2019). What does language assessment literacy mean to teachers? ELT Journal,

Volume 73, Issue 2, April 2019, Pages 113 123.

https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article/73/2/113/5310453?login=true.

Beziat, T. L. R., & Coleman, B. K. (2015). Classroom assessment literacy: Evaluating

pre-service teachers. The Researcher, 27(1), 25-30. https://www.nrmera.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/02/Beziat.and_.Coleman.2015.VOL_.27.Issue_.1. pdf.

Brame, C. (2013). Writing good multiple-choice test questions.

https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/writing-good-multiple-choice-test-questions/.

Diah Wulansari Hudaya, D. W. (2017). Proceedings Education and Language International

Conference Vol 1, No 1 (2017) http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ELIC/issue/vieW/184/ShowToc.

Haladyna, T. M et al. (20020. A Review of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Guidelines for

Classroom Assessment. APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 15(3), 309–334. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://sites.educ.ualberta.ca/staff/ldelia/M'Choice'Tests=Haladyna_GuidelinES_AME_2002.Pdf.

Herman, J et al. (2015). Investigating the dynamics of formative assessment: relationships

between teacher knowledge, assessment practice and learning. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice 22(3):1-24. https://www.researchgate.net/publicatiON/277582060_Investigating_the_dynamics_of_formative_assessment_relationships_between_teacher_knowledge_assessment_practice_and_learning.

Hoshino, Y. (2013) Relationship between types of distractor and difficulty of multiple-choice

vocabulary tests in sentential context. Language Testing in Asia

volume 3, Article number: 16 (2013).

https://languagetestingasia.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2229-0443-3-16.

Kemendiknas. (2005). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang

Guru Dan Dosen. http://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/UU14-2005GuruDosen.pdf.

Kemediknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 16

Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik Dan Kompetensi Guru.

https://bsnp-indonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Nomor-16-Tahun-2007-1.PDF.

Kemendikbud. (2021). Info LPTK Pendidikan Profesi Guru. https://ppg.kemdikbud.go.id/lptk/.

Lam, R. (2014). Language assessment training in Hong Kong: Implications for language

assessment literacy. https://journals.sagepub.com/dOI/10.1177/0265532214554321.

Lingam, G. I., & Lingam, N. (2016). Developing school heads as instructional leaders in

school–based assessment: Challenges and next steps. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltexT/EJ1091768.pdf.

Luthfiyyah, R et al. (2021). EFL secondary teachers’ assessment literacy: Assessment

conceptions and practices. Journal on English as a Foreign Language Vol 10, No 2 (2020).

https://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl/article/viEW/2101.

Marhaeni, I. N. et al. (2018). Teacher Assessment Literacy: Discrepancies in Authentic

Assessment Practice in EFL Context. ICEAP Proceeding Book Vol 2 (2018). http://iceap.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/iceap/article/view/90.

Mellati, M., & Khademi, M. (2018). Exploring Teachers’ Assessment Literacy: Impact on

Learners’ Writing Achievements and Implications for Teacher Development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(6). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1183660.pdf.

Mertler, C. A and Campbell, C. (2005). Measuring Teachers’ Knowledge & Application of

Classroom Assessment Concepts: Development of the Assessment Literacy Inventory. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490355.pdf.

Nurdiana. (2020). Language Teacher Assessment Literacy: A Current Review. Journal of

English Language and Culture http://journal.ubm.ac.id/xxx/xxx VOL.11 (No. 1): 66-74.Th. 2020 https://journal.ubm.ac.id/index.php/english-language-culture/article/viEW/2291/1934.

Pastore, S. (2018). What teachers need for a sound assessment.

https://www.researchgate.net/publicatiON/322739218_What_teachers_need_for_a_sound_assessment.

PPG. (2021). Tes Formatif Dan Sumatif Modul 6 Kb 1-4 Penilaian Hasil Belajar.

JALURPPGID https://www.jalurppg.id/2020/09/tes-formatif-dan-sumatif-modul-6-kb-1-4.html.

PPGSPADA. (2021). Modul 6 PEDAGOGIK PPG. PPGSPADA.BRIGHTSPACE.COM

https://ppgspadabrightspace.blogspot.COM/2019/05/modul-6-penilaian-hasil-belajar.html.

PPG. (2019). Modul Pedagogik Program Pengembangan Profesi Guru.

http://p3g.unm.ac.id/index.php/download/category/64-modul-pedagogik-umum.html.

Tarrant, M. et al. (2009). An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in

multiple- choice questions: A descriptive analysis. BMC Medical Education 9(1):40. https://www.researchgate.net/publicatiON/26650515_An_assessment_of_functioning_and_non- functioning_distractors_in_multiple-choice_questions_A_descriptive_analysis.

Vogt, K and Tsagari, D. (2014) Assessment Literacy of Foreign Language Teachers: Findings

of a European Study, Language Assessment Quarterly, 11:4, 374-402. https://www.researchgate.net/publicatiON/280217358_Assessment_Literacy_of_Foreign_Language_Teachers_Findings_of_a_European_Study/link/569f4bc308ae2C638eb638f2/download.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/mgs.v49i2.3456
PUBLISHER
Faculty of Teacher Education
Jl. Kalijudan 37, Surabaya 60114
Email: magister-scientiae@ukwms.ac.id

Magister Scientiae is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ISSN: 2622-7959

Hosted by Mason Publishing, part of the George Mason University Libraries.