• Home
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
  • Archive
  • Announcements
  • Editorial Board
MAIN MENU
  • Home
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
  • Current
  • Browse
  • Announcements
  • Submit
  • Editorial Board

MAGISTER SCIENTIAE

ABOUT THE JOURNAL
Authors Guidelines
Focus and Scope
Editorial Board
Reviewer
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Peer Review Process
Announcements
Contact Us

Visitors (since November 13th, 2017):

 

View Magister Scientiae Stats
Flag Counter

About The Author

Liza Stephanie

User
Journal Content

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
  • Other Journals
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Keywords Early Childhood teachers, readiness and involvement, online learning English vocabulary, Quizlet, students’ attitudes ICT, ICT literacy, TPACK, English teaching, generation Z Intelligence Quotient (IQ), Emotional Quotient (EQ), Spiritual Quotient (SQ), Speaking Proficiency, Indonesian Adults. Speaking, Textbook, Content Feasibility causal-comparative cloze technique distance learning, early childhood, early childhood education teacher eleventh graders higher-order thinking intermediate listening junior high school language learning strategies, high achievers, low achievers online learning reading ability reading comprehension questions reading proficiency self-efficacy students’ perspectives writing self-efficacy young learners, speaking, role-play
Home > No 25 (2009) > Stephanie

The Rhetorical Patterns of Argumentative Compositions of the English Department Students of Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya

Liza Stephanie

Abstract


This study is intended to reveal the rhetorical patterns
frequently found in the students’ argumentative compositions of the
English Department of Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya
specifically to the Classical Model of Argument. The data were taken
from their final exam papers the students of the English Department of
Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya who took Writing 3. The
analysis showed that only two of the students’ compositions were truly
linear. The other compositions were linear but with incomplete evidence
in the conclusion, and linear with indirect conclusion. It can then be
concluded that all students under study had not mastered the Plato-
Aristotelian style of writing especially to the Classical model of argument
quite well.

Save to Mendeley


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/mgs.v0i25.571
PUBLISHER
Faculty of Teacher Education
Jl. Kalijudan 37, Surabaya 60114
Email: magister-scientiae@ukwms.ac.id

Magister Scientiae is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ISSN: 2622-7959

Hosted by Mason Publishing, part of the George Mason University Libraries.