• Home
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
  • Archive
  • Announcements
  • Editorial Board
MAIN MENU
  • Home
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
  • Current
  • Browse
  • Announcements
  • Submit
  • Editorial Board

MAGISTER SCIENTIAE

ABOUT THE JOURNAL
Authors Guidelines
Focus and Scope
Editorial Board
Reviewer
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Peer Review Process
Announcements
Contact Us

Visitors (since November 13th, 2017):

 

View Magister Scientiae Stats
Flag Counter

About The Author

Teguh Adimarta

User
Journal Content

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
  • Other Journals
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Keywords ECCE Teachers Educational Linearity English textbook English vocabulary, Quizlet, students’ attitudes Junior High School Post-COVID-19 Science Process Skills awarenes creativity curriculum 2013 learning speaking metacognitive mind mapping peer review reading comprehension questions reading strategies social media speaking skill teaching competencies teaching writing. writing, writing aspects, writing difficulties, expository essays, narrative inquiry
Home > No 38 (2015) > Adimarta

GRICE’S CONVERSATIONAL COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLES IN COMPETITIVE DEBATES

Teguh Adimarta

Abstract


This study examined the similarity and difference between Grice’s conversational principles and debate competition principles in the grand final of an East Java highshool debate competition. Most highschool debaters including the researcher perceived that there would be differences. Using the result of open-response questionnaires distributed to the adjudicator and 6 participants of the grand final of the competition, the researcher then inteviewed and discussed the debate transcript and the result of open-response questionnaires with some triangulators from the perspective of Grice’s conversational principles and competitive debate principles. The study reported that the maxims that are mostly interpreted differently in this debate are the violation of maxim of quantity and the observation of maxim of quality. This research finding also proved that the maxims that are mostly interpreted similarly in this debate are the violation of maxim of quality and the observation of maxim of quantity.

Save to Mendeley


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/mgs.v0i38.787
PUBLISHER
Faculty of Teacher Education
Jl. Kalijudan 37, Surabaya 60114
Email: magister-scientiae@ukwms.ac.id

Magister Scientiae is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ISSN: 2622-7959

Hosted by Mason Publishing, part of the George Mason University Libraries.