The perception of students towards ChatGPT in the University of Bengkulu: A descriptive study

Yusri Fajri Annur, Iis Sujarwati

Abstract


The rapid advancement of AI technologies, particularly ChatGPT, is reshaping the educational landscape. Understanding how students perceive these technologies is crucial for their effective integration into academic environments. This study aims to investigate students' perceptions of ChatGPT's role in supporting academic tasks, such as learning, research, and assignments at the University of Bengkulu. A descriptive survey design was employed, utilizing structured questionnaires based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Responses from 75 students across various faculties were analyzed using descriptive statistics and ANOVA to explore perceptions regarding ChatGPTs usefulness, ease of use, and ethical considerations. The results indicate that students view ChatGPT as moderately useful, particularly for saving time on assignments and research tasks. However, there are ethical concerns, notably about plagiarism, and a demand for better training on the ethical use of AI. ChatGPT is perceived as a valuable tool in enhancing academic efficiency, but there is a need for comprehensive training to address ethical challenges in its use.


Keywords


ChatGPT, perceptions, AI integration, academic tasks, learning outcomes.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulai, A., & Hung, L. (2023). Will ChatGPT undermine ethical values in nursing education, research, and practice? Nursing Inquiry, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12556

Ajlouni, M., & Bhatti, A. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.19.22283643

Akay, ., & Koyi?it, A. (2023). The impact of learning styles and technology preference on academic achievement and satisfaction in online language learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 1-18.

Al-Hawari, K., Al-Khalifa, H., & Alsarihan, E. (2020). Factors influencing the acceptance of e-learning systems by university students: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Education and Learning, 14(3), 87-101.

Babbie, E. (2019). The practice of social research. Cengage Learning.

Chen, Y., et al. (2023). The utility of ChatGPT for cancer treatment information. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.16.23287316

Clark, J. (2023). Investigating the use of an artificial intelligence chatbot with general chemistry exam questions. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(5), 1905-1916. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00027

Dergaa, I., & Al-Masaeed, M. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623

Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Er, S. (2023). Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking plagiarism detection. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/fnh48

Eysenbach, G. (2023). The role of ChatGPT, generative language models, and artificial intelligence in medical education: A conversation with ChatGPT and a call for papers. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e46885. https://doi.org/10.2196/46885

Farhat, A., & Al-Masaeed, M. (2023). How trustworthy is ChatGPT? The case of bibliometric analyses. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202303.0479.v1

Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep421. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036

Hosseini, S., & Al-Masaeed, M. (2023). An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.31.23287979

Hung, L. (2023). Comparison of patient education materials generated by Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer versus experts. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 91(4), 409-412. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000003634

Iskender, M., & Amri, A. (2023). Holy or unholy? Interview with Open AIs ChatGPT. European Journal of Tourism Research, 34, 3414. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v34i.3169

Ivanov, I., & Soliman, M. (2023). Game of algorithms: ChatGPT implications for the future of tourism education and research. Journal of Tourism Futures, 9(2), 214-221. https://doi.org/10.1108/jtf-02-2023-0038.

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage Publications.

Jones, A., Smith, B., & Johnson, L. (2020). AI in academic settings: An analysis of student and faculty perceptions. Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 123-139.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Park, Y. R., & Shin, W. (2023). Exploring faculty adoption of digital technologies in higher education: A mixed-methods study. Education and Information Technologies, 48(8), 9555-9579.

Qasem, A., & Al-Masaeed, M. (2023). ChatGPT and medical education: A double-edged sword. Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science, 2(01), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.56741/jpes.v2i01.302

Rahman, M., & Watanobe, K. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202303.0473.v1

Scerri, M., & Morin, K. (2023). Using chatbots like ChatGPT to support nursing practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 32(15-16), 4211-4213. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16677

Smith, T., & Jones, R. (2018). Ethical considerations of AI in higher education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 16(4), 345-360.

Sun, L., & Hoelscher, C. (2023). The ChatGPT storm and what faculty can do. Nurse Educator, 48(3), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000001390

Tyson, L. (2023). Shortcomings of ChatGPT. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 3098-3101. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00361

UNESCO (2019). Artificial intelligence: A roadmap for UNESCO. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2012). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/bw.v11i2.5230

Copyright (c) 2024 Yusri Fajri Annur, Iis Sujarwati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Visitors (since February 20, 2017):
View Beyond Words Stats
Creative Commons License
Beyond Words is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License