Helping Students Create Their Own Books the Dialogic Way

George Jacobs

Abstract


This article explores one technique that is consistent with the student-centered paradigm in language education: student-generated books. First, benefits of student-generated are dis-cussed. Then, the article explores the crucial area of maintaining student ownership of their own books. The next topic explained in the article is why dialog is important as the students are developing their books. Finally, it is suggested that book creation works for students of all ages and levels, with examples given of students at the early childhood level and of second language students at university level.

Keywords


Student-generated; student-centered; writing; dialogic; self-reliance; peer in-teraction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abas, H. (2016). Indonesian EFL students' perspective on writing process: A pilot study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(3), 21-27.

del, A. (2017). Remember that your reader cannot read your mind: Problem/solution oriented metadiscourse in teacher feedback on student writing. English for Specific Purposes, 45, 54-68.

Alhammad, R., & Ku, H. Y. (2016). Graduate students' experiences and attitudes toward using e-books for college-level courses. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 5(2), 1-16. Retrieved from ttps://digscholarship.unco.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?articl026&context=jeri

Allen, J. (1985). Factors influencing the readability of student-generated texts. ((ERIC Document Reproduction Ser-vice No. ED 257 038).

Armstrong, T. (2018). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (4th ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Asaba, M., &Eidswick, J. (2018). The effect of topic interest and choice in second language journal writing. Writing & Pedagogy, 10(1-2), 161-190.

Blumberg, P. (2016). Assessing implementation of learner-centered teaching while providing faculty development. College Teaching, 64(4), 194-203.

Bromley, K. D. A. (1989). Buddy journals make the reading-writing connection. The Reading Teacher, 43(2), 122-129.

Degener, S., & Berne, J. (2017). Complex questions promote complex thinking. The Reading Teacher, 70(5), 595-599.

Doyle, B. G., & Bramwell, W. (2006). Promoting emergent literacy and social-emotional learning through dialogic reading. The Reading Teacher, 59(6), 554-564.

Farrell, T.S.C. (1999). Reflective teaching: A case study. Asian Journal of English Teaching, 9, 105-114.

Gregory, D. (2017). Lets get rid of art education in schools. Phi Delta Kap-pan, 98(7), 21-22.

Grobe, S. F., &Grobe, C. H. (1977). Read-ing skills as a correlate of writing ability in college freshmen. Literacy Research and Instruction, 17(1), 50-54.

Grolig, L., Cohrdes, C., Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2020). Narrative dialogic reading with wordless picture books: A cluster-randomized interven-tion study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 51, 191-203.

Heim, S., Stang, J., & Ireland, M. (2009). A garden pilot project enhances fruit and vegetable consumption among chil-dren. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(7), 1220-1226.

Holster, T. A., Lake, J. W., &Pellowe, W. R. (2017). Measuring and predicting graded reader difficulty. Reading in a Foreign Language, 29(2), 218-244.

Hoskisson, K. (1975). Successive approxi-mation and beginning reading. The Elementary School Journal, 75(7), 443-451.

Jacobs, G. M. (2014). Selecting extensive reading materials. Beyond Words, 2(1), 112-127. Retrieved from https:// files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED574001.pdf

Jacobs, G. M., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2001). Paradigm shift: Understanding and im-plementing change in second language education. TESL-EJ, 5, 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/ issues/volume5/ej17/ej17a1

Jacobs, G. M., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2012). Teachers sourcebook for extensive reading. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Kevany, K. M., &MacMichael, M. (2014). Communities of knowledge and knowl-edge of communities: An appreciative inquiry into rural wellbeing. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 7(1), 34-51. doi:10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3392

Kiss, T., &Weninger, C. (2017). Cultural learning in the EFL classroom: The role of visuals. ELT Journal, 71(2), 186-196.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and prac-tice in second language learning. New York, NY: Pergamon.

Long, M. H. (2017). Problems in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.

Long, M. H., & Sato, C. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers questions. In H. Seliger, H., &M. H. Long (Eds.), Class-room oriented research in second lan-guage acquisition(pp. 268-286).Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Manning, M. A. (2007). Self-concept and self-esteem in adolescents. Student Ser-vices, 2, 11-15.

Martins, M. A., Salvador, L., Albuquerque, A., & Silva, C. (2016). Invented spell-ing activities in small groups and early spelling and reading. Educational Psy-chology, 36(4), 738-752.

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370396.

Merisuo?Storm, T. (2006). Girls and boys like to read and write different texts. Scandinavian Journal of Educa-tional Research, 50(2), 111-125.

Min, H. T. (2016). Effect of teacher model-ing and feedback on EFL students peer review skills in peer review train-ing. Journal of Second Language Writ-ing, 31, 43-57.

Mitchell, C., Sneath, R., & Walker, R. J. (2019). Notes on introducing a standardised extensive reading program: First performance and initial expecta-tions. Reitaku University Journal, 102, 79-93.

Mukti, A. (2016). The effectiveness of dialogue journals in improving the skill in writing narrative texts. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 3(1), 1-14.

Pelton, L. F., & Pelton, T. (2009, June). The learner as teacher: Using student au-thored comics to teach mathematics concepts. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (pp. 1591-1599). Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Poole, S. (2019, March 25). The rise of robot authors: is the writing on the wall for human novelists? The Guardian. Retrieved fromhttps://www.theguarian.com/books/ 2019/mar/25/the-rise-of-robot-authors-is-the-writing-on-the-wall-for-human-novelists

Richardson, T., Elliott, P., & Roberts, R. (2017). Relationship between loneliness and mental health in students. Journal of Public Mental Health, 16(2), 48-54.

Song, D., Oh, E. Y., &Glazewski, K. (2017). Student-generated questioning activity in second language courses us-ing a customized personal response sys-tem: a case study. Educational Tech-nology Research and Develop-ment, 65(6), 1425-1449.

Sowell, J. (2019). Using models in the sec-ond-language writing classroom. Eng-lish Teaching Forum, 57(1), 2-13.

Sudirman, S., &Ati, S. (2019). The use of blogs to enhance students writing mo-tivation. LANGUA: Journal of Linguis-tics, Literature, and Language Educa-tion, 2(1), 39-44.

Sun, Z., Yang, X. M., & He, K. K. (2016). An extensive reading strategy to pro-mote online writing for elementary students in the 1: 1 digital classroom.

Computer Assisted Language Learn-ing, 29(2), 398-412.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society (ed. by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Prac-tice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cam-bridge University Press.

Yano, Y., Long, M. H., & Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts offoreign language reading com-prehension. Language Learning, 44(2), 189-219.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/bw.v8i1.2354

Copyright (c) 2020 Beyond Words

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Visitors (since February 20, 2017):
View Beyond Words Stats
Creative Commons License
Beyond Words is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License